LAW OFFICES OF MARIA E. CRABTREE
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Maria E. Crabtree, CFLS--Managing Attorney
    • L. Michelle Lopez-O'Bara, Esq.--Senior Associate Attorney
    • Gorsha Sur, Esq.--Associate Attorney
  • Support Staff
  • Mediation
  • Contact Us
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Español

Access to legal counsel in divorce: California Family Code 2030 Attorney Fees

7/2/2018

4 Comments

 
In a divorce proceeding, it is possible to win an award of attorney fee's from the other party. One of these methods is through sanctions under California Family Code Section 271, but you can also obtain attorney fees where there is no sanction-worthy conduct, through California Family Code Section 2030.

In essence, if one party has more access to funds to retain counsel in a divorce proceeding, that party may be ordered to pay the attorney fees of the other party. This ensures that the spouse with the more financial power cannot bulldoze the other party into a result that is not in their best interest. These attorney fee awards are capped at what is a "reasonable" amount, which allows the court discretion to not award large attorney fee awards that are unwarranted. You can read the text of California Family Code Section 2030 below. 
​
"(a)(1) In a proceeding for dissolution of marriage, nullity of marriage, or legal separation of the parties, and in any proceeding subsequent to entry of a related judgment, the court shall ensure that each party has access to legal representation, including access early in the proceedings, to preserve each party's rights by ordering, if necessary based on the income and needs assessments, one party, except a governmental entity, to pay to the other party, or to the other party's attorney, whatever amount is reasonably necessary for attorney's fees and for the cost of maintaining or defending the proceeding during the pendency of the proceeding.
(2) When a request for attorney's fees and costs is made, the court shall make findings on whether an award of attorney's fees and costs under this section is appropriate, whether there is a disparity in access to funds to retain counsel, and whether one party is able to pay for legal representation of both parties.  If the findings demonstrate disparity in access and ability to pay, the court shall make an order awarding attorney's fees and costs.  A party who lacks the financial ability to hire an attorney may request, as an in pro per litigant, that the court order the other party, if that other party has the financial ability, to pay a reasonable amount to allow the unrepresented party to retain an attorney in a timely manner before proceedings in the matter go forward.
(b) Attorney's fees and costs within this section may be awarded for legal services rendered or costs incurred before or after the commencement of the proceeding.
(c) The court shall augment or modify the original award for attorney's fees and costs as may be reasonably necessary for the prosecution or defense of the proceeding, or any proceeding related thereto, including after any appeal has been concluded.
(d) Any order requiring a party who is not the spouse of another party to the proceeding to pay attorney's fees or costs shall be limited to an amount reasonably necessary to maintain or defend the action on the issues relating to that party.
(e) The Judicial Council shall, by January 1, 2012, adopt a statewide rule of court to implement this section and develop a form for the information that shall be submitted to the court to obtain an award of attorney's fees under this section."

4 Comments

    Authors

    Maria E. Crabtree, CFLS
    Rebecca L. Lovell, Esq.
    Kelley F. Stieler, Esq.
    ​Alistair Shaw, Esq.

    Categories

    All
    Child Custody/Visitation
    Child Support
    Divorce
    Paternity
    Property
    The Electronic Age

    Archives

    April 2020
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    May 2017
    December 2015
    June 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    August 2012

    RSS Feed



    Disclaimers:  This web site and blog is designed for general information only. Information posted on this site and blog does not constitute legal advice. By accessing this site and blog, you do not form an attorney-client relationship with Maria E. Crabtree.  Family law is a state-specific practice, and Maria E. Crabtree only represents clients whose cases are within California's jurisdiction.

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Maria E. Crabtree, CFLS--Managing Attorney
    • L. Michelle Lopez-O'Bara, Esq.--Senior Associate Attorney
    • Gorsha Sur, Esq.--Associate Attorney
  • Support Staff
  • Mediation
  • Contact Us
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Español