When celebrity marriages end, the tabloids often focus on drama. But beneath the headlines lie real legal questions that affect everyday families. The recent news of Jessica Alba filing for divorce from her husband Cash Warren after 16 years of marriage brings attention to several core issues in California family law — including prenups, custody, and privacy.
At Crabtree Law, PC, we believe every client — celebrity or not — deserves clear information and compassionate guidance. Here’s what this high-profile case can teach us.

💍 No Prenup: Why It Matters in California
Reports suggest that Alba and Warren did not sign a prenuptial agreement before their 2008 wedding. In a community property state like California, that means most assets and debts acquired during the marriage are presumed to be owned equally by both spouses.
With Alba’s business ventures (including The Honest Company) and Warren’s investments, determining what qualifies as community versus separate property can be complex — and without a prenup, courts must rely on extensive disclosures and valuations.
Lesson:
Prenuptial or postnuptial agreements are not just for the wealthy. They are practical legal tools that give couples certainty and prevent costly disputes later.

👨‍👩‍👧 Custody and Co-Parenting: The Children Come First
Both Alba and Warren are reportedly seeking joint legal and physical custody of their three children. This aligns with California’s preference for shared parenting whenever it supports the children’s best interests.
Even amicable divorces require detailed parenting plans that cover education, healthcare, holidays, and travel. At Crabtree Law, PC, we help parents build customized custody arrangements that prioritize stability and minimize conflict.
Lesson:
Successful co-parenting starts with collaboration, not confrontation.

🔒 Privacy in the Public Eye (and Online)
Celebrities face public scrutiny, but privacy is a challenge for many families today. Courts increasingly review social-media behavior, online posts, and digital communication when deciding custody and credibility.
Even private citizens can unintentionally damage their case through online sharing.
Lesson:
Keep your legal matters off social media. Let your attorney handle communications and protect your family’s privacy.

⚖️ Takeaways for California Families Jessica Alba’s case reflects some universal truths about divorce and family law:

• 💬 Plan ahead — A prenup or postnup can provide peace of mind.
• 👶 Focus on your children — Courts reward cooperation and emotional stability.
• 💻 Protect your privacy — What’s online can be used in court.
• 🤝 Seek experienced counsel — Family law decisions can shape your future.

📞 Need Guidance Through Divorce or Custody Issues? At Crabtree Law, PC, we provide compassionate, strategic legal representation for families throughout Oakland, Walnut Creek, and the greater East Bay. Whether you’re facing a complex property division or a sensitive custody matter, our attorneys will help you move forward with confidence.

​When Cardi B and Offset’s divorce made headlines, the spotlight was on celebrity drama. Recently, Cardi revealed that the divorce has been delayed because Offset is allegedly demanding financial concessions before agreeing to finalize. While their case involves mansions and millions, the legal issues are strikingly similar to what many families in California face when going through a divorce.
If you’re considering divorce or already in the middle of one, here are the key family law lessons from Cardi B’s situation and how they apply to everyday people.

Delays in Finalizing a Divorce
Even in California, divorces don’t always move quickly. When spouses can’t agree on terms like property division or spousal support, cases may drag on for months or even years.
 Lesson for families: If your spouse refuses to cooperate, the court can still move forward. Having a skilled California divorce attorney ensures your case doesn’t remain stuck because of delays.

Division of Property and Assets
Cardi B suggested that Offset wants property transferred before finalizing the divorce. This highlights a major issue in many divorces: who gets what.
In California, a community property state, assets acquired during marriage are generally split 50/50. But the process becomes complex when real estate, businesses, or retirement accounts are involved.
 Lesson for families: Proper financial documentation, and sometimes a prenuptial agreement, can make dividing assets smoother and protect your financial future.

Handling Debt After Divorce
Offset reportedly wants Cardi to cover tax liabilities. While not everyone has multi-million-dollar tax bills, many couples face disputes over credit card debt, mortgages, and loans.
 Lesson for families: Dividing debt is just as important as dividing property. Without strong legal representation, you could end up with more than your fair share of financial obligations.

Child Custody and Parenting Time
Although most reports focus on money, Cardi B and Offset also share children. Like every family, their divorce must also address custody and parenting arrangements.
In California, the court’s main concern is the best interests of the child focusing on stability, safety, and parental involvement.
 Lesson for families: Even in high-conflict divorces, custody should remain centered on the child, not parental disputes.

Public vs. Private Resolution
For celebrities, the press adds pressure. For everyday families, that pressure often comes from extended family or community. Court battles are stressful and public.
 Lesson for families: Mediation or collaborative divorce can help resolve issues privately, giving you more control over    outcomes.

Why This Matters for You
While Cardi B’s divorce involves celebrity-scale finances, the underlying family law issues, delays, property division, debt allocation, and custody are universal.
If you’re navigating similar challenges, a knowledgeable family law attorney in California can help you:

• Protect your financial interests,
• Ensure debts are fairly divided, and
• Keep your children’s wellbeing at the forefront.

 If you’re facing divorce or custody issues, don’t wait. Contact our office to schedule a consultation with an experienced California divorce lawyer who can help protect your future.

​California Law and Domestic Violence: What You Need to Know About Custody Battles Involving Emotional and Psychological Abuse
When it comes to family law, especially in custody battles, emotional and psychological abuse is often overlooked compared to physical abuse. However, in recent cases, such as the ongoing divorce and custody battle between Kim Zolciak and her ex-husband, Kroy Biermann, accusations of emotional and psychological abuse are at the forefront.
California law provides clear guidelines for how custody decisions are made, and claims of emotional abuse can heavily influence the court’s determination of what is in the “best interests of the children.” Let’s dive deeper into how California law handles these types of allegations and what parents need to understand when involved in similar custody disputes.

The Zolciak-Biermann Custody Battle: A Case Study 
In a high-profile case that’s captured the media’s attention, Kroy Biermann, a retired NFL player, has petitioned the court for sole custody of his four minor children with reality TV star Kim Zolciak. His claims center around allegations that Zolciak is emotionally and psychologically abusive toward their children.

Biermann's court filings suggest that Zolciak’s home environment is lacking in structure and accountability, which he believes is harmful to their children. He accuses her of being emotionally unstable, neglecting her children's day-to-day care, and even leaving them under the supervision of others for extended periods of time.

Zolciak’s representative, however, denies the allegations, calling them “completely false” and stating that Zolciak has been a loving and attentive mother, ensuring her children’s emotional well-being despite the challenges they face during the divorce.
While the public nature of this case is unique, it highlights an important issue in family law: when emotional or psychological abuse is alleged, it can significantly impact custody decisions.

California’s Approach to Custody and Abuse Allegations
Under California law, custody is determined based on the "best interests of the child." In evaluating custody arrangements, courts will consider many factors, but the safety and well-being of the children are paramount. This includes protecting children from exposure to any form of abuse—physical, emotional, or psychological.

California law provides that emotional abuse is considered just as damaging as physical abuse, especially when it negatively impacts a child’s development and mental health. In custody disputes, emotional and psychological abuse can be used as grounds for requesting sole custody or modifying existing custody arrangements.

What is Emotional and Psychological Abuse?
Emotional and psychological abuse can take many forms, and the effects can be just as detrimental, if not more so, than physical abuse. Common examples include:

• Verbal Abuse: Insults, belittling, constant criticism, or mocking.
• Neglect: Failing to provide adequate care, leaving children unsupervised for long periods, or failing to meet their emotional needs.
• Manipulation and Control: Intentionally isolating a child from their other parent or using guilt or fear to control a child’s behavior.
• Exposing Children to Conflict: Subjecting children to constant arguing, inappropriate discussions, or using them as pawns in parental conflicts.

If a parent can demonstrate that these behaviors are occurring, they may petition the court for a modification of custody arrangements to protect the child.

How Does This Affect Custody Decisions in California?
When there are allegations of emotional or psychological abuse in a custody case, the court will often appoint a minor’s counsel, who is a lawyer that represents the best interests of the child. In some cases, the court may also order therapeutic interventions for the children or the parents, such as counseling, to ensure the children’s safety and mental health are prioritized.
Courts may also review evidence such as:

• Testimonies from therapists, teachers, or other professionals who have observed the children's behavior and emotional state.
• Documents or other records demonstrating a history of abusive behavior or neglect.
• Witnesses who can attest to the home environment and whether it supports the child’s well-being.

Sole Custody vs. Shared Custody: What’s Best for the Children?
In the Zolciak-Biermann case, Kroy Biermann is seeking sole custody, arguing that the current shared custody arrangement is no longer in the children’s best interest. Under California law, sole custody may be awarded if it can be proven that one parent is unable to provide a stable and safe environment for the child.

On the other hand, California encourages shared custody when possible, believing that children benefit from having both parents involved in their lives. However, this can change if one parent’s behavior is harmful to the child’s well-being.

If a parent’s actions jeopardize a child’s safety or mental health—whether through neglect, emotional abuse, or other harmful behaviors—the court may grant sole custody to the other parent, particularly if the accused parent cannot demonstrate significant improvement or stability.

What Should Parents Know About Custody Disputes Involving Abuse Allegations?

• Documentation is Key: Parents involved in a custody dispute should keep thorough records of any incidents of abuse or neglect. This could include text messages, emails, photographs, or even notes from counseling sessions.
• Professional Help: Working with therapists or other professionals who can testify to the emotional and psychological effects on the children can be vital in these types of cases.
• Stay Calm and Focused: While it may be tempting to engage in a public battle or to retaliate against the other parent, it’s important to remember that the court will focus on the child’s well-being, not the parents' personal grievances.

Final Thoughts
​The Zolciak-Biermann case serves as a reminder that emotional and psychological abuse can have a profound impact on children’s well-being, and courts take these allegations seriously in custody disputes. California law is designed to protect children from such harm, and custody decisions are made with their best interests in mind.

If you are involved in a custody dispute and believe that your children are being emotionally or psychologically abused, it’s crucial to seek legal advice. Family law attorneys specializing in domestic violence and custody matters can help you navigate this complex area of the law to ensure your children’s safety and security.
​
If you need help with a custody issue or have concerns about your family’s situation, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional legal support. The well-being of your children is worth fighting for.

Recently, news broke that the CEO of Astronomer—a high-profile tech company—was allegedly caught cheating. While the personal details are making headlines, this situation is a reminder that infidelity doesn’t just affect emotions—it can have serious legal and financial consequences, especially for high-income earners, entrepreneurs, and business owners.

At Crabtree Law, we work with clients across California who are navigating complex divorces involving infidelity, hidden assets, and high-value businesses. If you're in a position similar to the parties in the Astronomer scandal—whether you’re the one betrayed or the one being accused—it’s critical to understand your rights and take steps to protect yourself.

Cheating in California: Is It Legally Relevant?
California is a no-fault divorce state, which means you don’t need to prove wrongdoing (like adultery) to end a marriage. That said, infidelity can still play a major role in divorce proceedings—particularly when it comes to:

- Wasteful spending of marital assets on an affair
- Emotional leverage in negotiations
- Custody decisions, when new relationships affect children
- The timing of separation and support obligations

If your spouse has spent money on gifts, travel, or support for another person, you may be entitled to reimbursement of those funds under California’s community property laws.

Business Owners, Executives & Infidelity: Why the Stakes Are HigherIn high-net-worth divorces—especially when a business is involved—the financial fallout of cheating can be substantial. You may be facing:

- Business valuation disputes
- Claims of income suppression or misallocation
- Pressure to divide equity, RSUs, or company shares
- Public scrutiny that could harm your brand or leadership role

We help clients shield their business interests and maintain privacy during these complex legal processes.
​
How Crabtree Law Protects Your Interests
At Crabtree Law, we provide strategic and discreet legal counsel for clients facing emotionally charged divorces. Our firm is based in Walnut Creek, California, and we serve clients throughout the East Bay and greater Bay Area.

We offer:

- Confidential consultations—we protect your privacy from day one
- High-conflict representation for custody, asset division, and spousal support
- Business protection strategies to preserve your company during divorce
- Support with estate planning, prenups, and postnups to prevent future risks

Final Thoughts
Whether you’re a public figure or a private professional, infidelity doesn’t have to define your outcome—but how you respond to it can. The Astronomer CEO story may fade from the headlines, but for many couples, the consequences of betrayal can last for years. Let us help you move forward with clarity, confidence, and legal strength.

Contact Crabtree Law today to schedule a confidential consultation and learn how we can help protect what matters most.

Custody disputes are among the most emotionally charged aspects of family law, and when celebrities go through them, the public gets a front-row seat to legal battles that can offer important lessons. One of the most infamous custody cases in recent years has been the ongoing dispute between Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt.
The Jolie-Pitt Custody Battle: A Long and Complicated Dispute
Since their split in 2016, Jolie and Pitt have been locked in a legal battle over the custody of their six children. The case has involved allegations of domestic abuse, disputes over parenting time, and even conflicts over the involvement of private judges. The high-profile nature of their case highlights key elements of custody disputes, including parental fitness, the best interests of the child, and the impact of allegations on court proceedings.
Key Custody Considerations Under California Law
In California, custody decisions are guided by the best interests of the child standard. Courts consider several factors, including:

• The child’s health, safety, and welfare
• Any history of domestic violence or substance abuse
• The nature and amount of contact with both parents
• The child’s relationship with each parent

A crucial aspect of the Jolie-Pitt case has been the role of abuse allegations. Jolie alleged that Pitt engaged in abusive behavior, which triggered legal investigations and had a direct impact on custody decisions. California courts take such allegations seriously, often requiring evidence such as witness testimony, reports from child welfare services, or expert evaluations before making a determination.
Parental Alienation and Custody Disputes
Another issue present in high-conflict custody cases is parental alienation, where one parent is accused of attempting to turn the child against the other parent. In contested cases like Jolie and Pitt’s, courts carefully evaluate whether a parent’s actions are negatively influencing the child’s relationship with the other parent.
What Parents Can Learn from This Case
The Jolie-Pitt custody battle offers important lessons for parents facing similar disputes:

1. Document Everything – If domestic violence or substance abuse is a concern, keeping records, police reports, and medical documentation can be critical in court.
2. Understand That Allegations Carry Legal Weight – Courts require substantial evidence before altering custody due to allegations of abuse.
3. Prioritize the Child’s Well-Being – Despite conflicts between parents, courts will always focus on what benefits the child the most.
4. Seek Mediation When Possible – Lengthy legal battles can be emotionally and financially draining. Mediation or co-parenting counseling may help resolve disputes without prolonged litigation.

Call our office today for a free, half hour, case evaluation with one of our attorneys!
​The Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt custody case highlights the complexities of family law and how deeply personal disputes can become public legal battles. Whether you are navigating a custody dispute involving allegations or simply seeking a fair co-parenting arrangement, understanding your legal rights and working with an experienced attorney can make all the difference in protecting your child’s best interests.

​Child Support Modifications: Lessons from Liam Gallagher’s Legal Battle
Child support is a critical aspect of family law that ensures children receive the financial resources they need. However, as circumstances change, so can child support obligations. A high-profile example of this is former Oasis frontman Liam Gallagher’s ongoing child support dispute, which highlights key legal principles regarding modifications to support orders.
The Gallagher Case: A Fight Over Increased Support
Liam Gallagher, known for his rockstar persona and musical legacy, is currently involved in a legal dispute with Liza Ghorbani, the mother of his child. Ghorbani is seeking an increase in child support, arguing that Gallagher’s anticipated earnings from an upcoming Oasis reunion tour justify a higher payment. Despite Gallagher’s history of paying support, the request for an increase demonstrates a common issue in family law: When and how can child support orders be modified?
California Law on Child Support Modifications
Under California law, child support can be modified if there is a “material change in circumstances.” This means that if a parent’s income significantly increases or decreases, the court may adjust support payments accordingly. Some common reasons for modifications include:

• A substantial increase in the paying parent's income
• A decrease in the receiving parent's income or financial need
• A change in the child’s expenses, such as medical or educational costs
• A shift in custody arrangements

Gallagher’s Case
In Gallagher’s situation, Ghorbani’s claim hinges on the fact that his earnings are expected to rise dramatically due to the Oasis reunion tour. If he were subject to California law, a court would likely assess whether his new earnings constitute a significant, consistent increase rather than a temporary windfall. Courts typically consider long-term financial stability rather than one-time spikes in income.
Furthermore, the court would evaluate the child’s current needs to determine if an increase is warranted. Simply because one parent’s income increases does not automatically mean the child requires more support. The receiving parent must demonstrate how the additional funds would benefit the child.
What Parents Can Learn from This Case
Gallagher’s case offers valuable lessons for parents navigating child support modifications:

1. Keep Records of Income Changes – If you anticipate an increase or decrease in income, document it thoroughly. Courts will rely on financial records to make determinations.
2. Understand That Not All Income Increases Justify Higher Support – A temporary boost in earnings may not be enough to modify support. Courts look at sustained financial changes.
3. Demonstrate the Child’s Needs – If you are seeking an increase in support, be prepared to show why the child requires additional financial resources.
4. Seek Legal Advice Early – Whether requesting or contesting a modification, working with an experienced family law attorney can help you navigate the complexities of the legal process.

Liam Gallagher’s child support battle serves as a reminder that modifications to support payments require legal justification and careful financial analysis. Whether you are seeking to increase, decrease, or defend a support order, understanding California’s legal standards can help you achieve a fair and reasonable outcome.  Please give our office a call for a free, half-hour, case evaluation with one of our attorneys!

​By: KTNV Staff
Posted at 10:38 AM, Apr 08, 2024

​LAS VEGAS (KTNV) — Three people are dead after a shooting at a law office in the Summerlin area on Monday morning.
A source tells us shots were fired amid a deposition, and that the shooter killed two people before fatally shooting himself.
Additional sources told Channel 13 police were responding to Prince Law Group, with offices located on the corner of Charleston Boulevard and Pavilion Center Drive.
Prince Law Group released the following statement regarding Monday's shooting:
With profound sadness, Prince Law Group would like to thank everyone who has reached out to us with heartfelt messages of concern and sympathy over the tragic violence that occurred this morning in our offices. We ask that you please respect the privacy of the families involved.

More
Channel 13 is also learning new details regarding the relationship between Ashley Prince and her ex-husband Dylan Houston. Court records revealed the two were married in October 2017 and after four years and two kids, Dylan Houston filed for divorce. At first, the couple split custody evenly, but in the spring of 2022, Ashley asked to modify the custody agreement.
The court also ordered Dylan to undergo regular drug and alcohol screenings and to remain at least 100 yards away from Ashley's home, work, and parents' home. Ashley and Dennis Prince were married in late 2023.

Lt. Jason Johansson provided new details regarding the shooting. A total of seven people were present during the shooting: three representing one party, three representing the other, and a court reporter. He added that the building is expected to reopen tomorrow except for Suite 560, where the crime took place.

Multiple sources in both law enforcement and the legal community have identified attorney Joe Houston as the gunman who killed two people and himself at a Summerlin area law office this morning.
Among the victims are Houston's former daughter-in-law, Ashley Prince, and her new husband, attorney Dennis Prince, sources say.
Those same sources explain that Joe Houston was representing his son, Dylan Houston (also an attorney), in child custody proceedings with Ashley Prince — who was being represented in those same proceedings by her new husband.
Joe Houston, Ashley Prince and Dennis Prince were present for a deposition in the custody case involving Ashley and her former husband (Houston's son). The former couple have two young children together.
Houston is said to have shot Ashley and Dennis Prince before turning the weapon on himself. Sources also tell us that the now-deceased couple (Dennis and Ashley Prince) recently welcomed a new baby — their only child together.

"In times of darkness, it is often the strength of our unity that sees us through. Today, we find ourselves grappling with the aftermath of a tragedy that has shaken not only a community but the very fabric of our profession. The recent shootings at a family law office in Las Vegas have left us all reeling, as we come to terms with the senseless loss of life and the profound impact on those left behind.
As members of the legal community, we are not immune to the pain and anguish that accompanies such a horrific event. We are bound by a shared commitment to justice, compassion, and the pursuit of truth. Yet, in the face of tragedy, we must also come together to offer solace and support to those who need it most.
Our hearts go out to the victims and their families, whose lives have been forever altered by this unfathomable act of violence. We stand in solidarity with our colleagues in Las Vegas, as they navigate through this unimaginable ordeal. In times like these, it is imperative that we lean on one another for strength and support, drawing on the resilience of our community to guide us forward."

​PATRICIA KIRK
CONTRIBUTED TO THE GLOBE AND MAIL
PUBLISHED JULY 6, 2017

​'I'm not happy and I'm going to get a divorce" my husband announced one morning as he was crossing the bedroom floor on his way to the bathroom.
I'm not that obtuse, but perhaps I had missed some clues about unhappiness because this pronouncement was like a thunder bolt, a cataclysmic statement of which I had no prior warning. Thus began my journey – at the age of 73 – into singledom.
We had been married for 23 years prior to his startling announcement (a second marriage for both). My first husband died, so I had no inkling about how one goes about getting divorced and certainly no clue about the lengthy process it is to become unhitched.
At first, I entreated against such an outcome. "What was wrong? Why, couldn't we fix it?" But he was adamant that divorce was the only solution.
My husband had heard the term "collaborative divorce," and suggested that was the route we should take. Unfortunately, his definition of collaborate did not involve respectful back and forth discussion or compromise and we ended up in a 2 1/2-year battle negotiated by two very expensive lawyers.
There is a recently identified phenomenon called grey divorce. Couples who have been together 30, 40, or even 50 years are deciding they do not want to live out their last years together. Some divorce for the usual reasons: infidelity or they are no longer able to live with their partner's drinking or gambling or abusiveness. But many realize they haven't communicated for decades and decide they don't want to continue with the same old patterns for what remains of their lives. I reluctantly found myself a member of this ever-growing group. Rather than feeling on the cutting edge, I was devastated. I felt I was being forced to reinvent my life, a daunting task for a septuagenarian.
I lost weight, couldn't sleep, had anxiety attacks and blubbered profusely on all my friends shoulders as I was utterly hurt, sad and angry all at once. I am no stranger to coping. When my first husband died, I was left with two young teenagers whose hormones were raging and who regarded me, as the now sole parent as a whole new ballgame, where all limits had to be retested. My son, a caring and intelligent individual, died by suicide at the age of 31, after a private battle with bipolar disorder. The loss of a child is the biggest blow a parent can ever suffer, but grey divorce comes a close second.
But I did learn and develop new skills. I learned how to enjoy chopping kindling for my wood-burning stove. Cutting the lawn and taking the garbage cans to the street are not nearly the difficult tasks they were purported to be. My triumph was detecting that an obnoxious smell in the house was coming from the crawl space. Crawl-space investigation was new to me, but who would have thought that retrieving two malodorous dead rats from the depths would feel like a badge of honour. "If I can do this, I can do anything. Yes, I can run this place on my own."
The divorce coach, a counselling specialty previously unknown to me, was invaluable. One day she said, "There are opportunities in this kind of situation." What opportunities could there possibly be in aloneness and depleted finances? And yet, there are. I took a leap outside my comfort zone and signed up for a cycling/hiking trip to Tanzania. I didn't quite make it to the top of Mount Kilimanjaro, but it was expanding to try.
A name change can be included at no extra cost in a divorce decree, so I took the opportunity and went back to my maiden name. To celebrate my "coming out" as Ms. Kirk, I threw a party and invited everyone who had been so supportive, inclusive and patient with me over the past 2 1/2 years. It was a blast!
I vowed I would never have another man in my life. Some of my friends (all grannies) were dabbling in internet dating, but it was a process I had absolutely no interest in. However, a member of my cycle club invited me to join him for dinner. I accepted the invitation and then began to fuss. "I don't want a relationship, and besides, I haven't been on a date for 30 years!" A sage friend of mine put it in perspective by saying, "It's only a dinner invitation; for God's sake, just go out and enjoy the evening!" I did, and a year and a half later, he and I are still enjoying each other's company. Having lived with two of the most sedentary men in the world, it is a delight to spend time with an energetic, active person who enjoys cycling and hiking as much as I do. (And besides, he has beautiful eyes.)
Divorce is a difficult process, a roller coaster of emotions, feelings of abandonment, grieving and a questioning of one's worth. I have read that it could take three to five years to recover from a grey divorce.
Three years in, I do feel that I have turned a corner and am well on my way to recovery. I feel more settled and am happy with my own company. There are opportunities out there, bucket lists to ponder and act upon, grandchildren to frolic with and old and new friendships to nurture. It's not a matter of reinventing my life but to keep on living it with verve and enthusiasm.
Patricia Kirk lives in Victoria

​GYPSY ROSE BLANCHARDARGUMENTS & GUILT-TRIPPING BY RYAN... Led To Separation according to TMZ

​Gypsy Rose Blanchard's post-prison fairytale with her husband came to an end last week -- and now ... we know exactly what led up to the split.
Sources with direct knowledge tell TMZ ...  Gypsy has been telling family and friends that her estranged hubby, Ryan Anderson, had become super argumentative post-prison release and was constantly making her feel like she couldn't do anything right.

We're told one of the major sticking points in Gypsy and Ryan's relationship was his apparent jealousy over her spending time with her dad -- that's what our sources say Gypsy has been telling people anyway.

​

Instead of supporting her bond with her father, we're told Gypsy feels like Ryan made her feel guilty about not spending that time with him exclusively.


​

​After spending years behind bars, we're told Gypsy was eager to reconnect and build relationships with her family ... and our sources say she felt suffocated by Ryan's constant guilt-tripping. We're also now hearing Gypsy's inner circle had serious concerns about Ryan's intentions -- especially over the fact he only reached out to Gypsy on a dare.

By Shelby Stivale of US Weekly